2006
DOI: 10.1021/pr060142d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Identification of Sub-nanogram Levels of Protein in a NanoLC-Trypsin-MS System

Abstract: Proteomic workflows involving liquid-based protein separations are an alternative to gel-based protein analysis, however the trypsin digestion procedure is usually difficult to implement, particularly when processing low abundance proteins from capillary column effluent. To convert the protein to peptides for the purpose of identification, current protocols require several sample handling steps, and sample losses become an issue. In this study, we present an improved system that conducts reversed-phase protein… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bottom-up) LC-MS analyses after digestion into an integrated platform have been attempted with varying degrees of success. Many approaches have been developed, and most of them use an integrated on-column microreactor based on some form of enzyme immobilization for the rapid digestion of protein fractions into peptides (11,45,46). Although many of these approaches were successful in digesting proteins on line, their application to demanding proteomics experiments proved to be limited because of rapid inactivation of the immobilized enzyme presumably by endogenous proteases, mobile phase additives and impurities, organic solvents, endogenous inhibitors, and other factors (47).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bottom-up) LC-MS analyses after digestion into an integrated platform have been attempted with varying degrees of success. Many approaches have been developed, and most of them use an integrated on-column microreactor based on some form of enzyme immobilization for the rapid digestion of protein fractions into peptides (11,45,46). Although many of these approaches were successful in digesting proteins on line, their application to demanding proteomics experiments proved to be limited because of rapid inactivation of the immobilized enzyme presumably by endogenous proteases, mobile phase additives and impurities, organic solvents, endogenous inhibitors, and other factors (47).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be also connected with related components directly for on-line digestion [9,10]. Nowadays, a variety of IMERs have been developed with different supporting materials, e.g., membranes [11][12][13], particles [14][15][16], monoliths and so on. Among them, the monolith based IMER [17][18][19][20][21] has drawn great attention due to its high capacity for enzymes, fast and simple preparation, low back-pressure, biological inertia and mechanical stability, rendering greatly enhanced digestion efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of protein-level prefractionations were performed offline which might result in the decreased sensitivity and analytical throughput. Recently, Slysz and Schriemer [83,84] proposed an approach to achieve protein separation by RPLC, on-line digestion by IMER and identification by peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) search. High sequence coverage could be easily achieved at the 20 fmol level, with the limit of detection (LOD) down to 5 fmol for myoglobin.…”
Section: Integrated Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%