2003
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.41.11.5041-5045.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Identification of Entamoeba Species in Stool Samples by a Reverse Line Hybridization Assay

Abstract: Classically, detection of Entamoeba histolytica is performed by microscopic examination for characteristic cysts and/or trophozoites in fecal preparations. Differentiation of E. histolytica cysts and those of nonpathogenic amoebic species is made on the basis of the appearance and the size of the cysts. However, by classical means objective tools for confirmation and quality control do not exist. Therefore, a reverse line blot hybridization assay was developed to detect a variety of Entamoeba species and genet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This simple diagnostic PCR technique does not require extra steps, as is the case with nested PCR (2), PCRrestricted fragment length polymorphism (13), and PCR with reverse line blot hybridization (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This simple diagnostic PCR technique does not require extra steps, as is the case with nested PCR (2), PCRrestricted fragment length polymorphism (13), and PCR with reverse line blot hybridization (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of these methods for detecting E. moshkovskii has been shown to be higher than that of microscopy. However, these methods are still relatively time-consuming and require extra and complex procedures, such as nested PCR, restriction endonuclease assays, or hybridization, to achieve their higher sensitivity (2,3,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…QIAamp tissue kit spin columns (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) have been used for the purification of DNA from microscopy-positive samples stored at Ϫ20°C in phosphate-buffered saline (196,199) and for DNA isolation using other modifications (such as treatment with 2% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone [Sigma]) which improve the sensitivity of the PCR (197). The use of the QIAamp stool kit for the extraction of DNA from fecal samples was a major advance, and this has proven to be the most widely accepted method for DNA ex- (50,51,54,65,82,129,196,199) and are now used widely in clinical research laboratories in developed nations, as they minimize the extraction time and the DNA can be extracted directly from the feces without the need to culture the parasites.…”
Section: Methods Of Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA of the above mentioned species you can vary the amoebas by using molecular biology methods such as: nested PCR, real-time PCR, LC-PCR, PCR-SHELA, Reverse Line Hybridization Assay [8][9][10]29,38,39,41,[46][47][48][49]. These methods according to Tanyuksel et al, are characterized by high sensitivity (> 70%) and a very high specificity (> 90%) in the diagnosis of intestinal amoebiasis, parenteral amoebiasis and amoebic liver abscess [6].…”
Section: Cysts and Trophozoites Of Entamoeba Histolytica Microscopicamentioning
confidence: 99%