2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and identification of bacterial DNA in semen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
51
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
51
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…[7] Yet, in light of the increasing number of patients seeking treatment for impaired fertility using assisted reproduction (intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection), the diagnosis of “silent” genital tract infections should receive attention as the infection may be linked to asthenozoospermia. [8] Infections are potentially treatable causes of male infertility and resistance to common antibiotics and poor compliance may impede the efficacy of antibiotics in resolving complicated UTI or restoring fertility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] Yet, in light of the increasing number of patients seeking treatment for impaired fertility using assisted reproduction (intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection), the diagnosis of “silent” genital tract infections should receive attention as the infection may be linked to asthenozoospermia. [8] Infections are potentially treatable causes of male infertility and resistance to common antibiotics and poor compliance may impede the efficacy of antibiotics in resolving complicated UTI or restoring fertility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To broadly assess whether the endogenous microbiome of the semen compartment [25] impacted semen immunology and sVL, total bacterial load was quantified by 16S rRNA. In men free of bacterial STIs, the total bacterial load was positively correlated with both the HIV sVL (Spearman rho = 0.51; P = .016) (Figure 3) and the SI score (Spearman rho = 0.48; P = .024), and it was higher in participants meeting criteria for SI (median log 10 bacterial load 7.03 vs 5.40; P = .003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seminal specimens from men examined for fertility problems contained even a greater variety of microorganisms, including anaerobic microfl ora [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%