2006
DOI: 10.1190/1.2215357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and extraction of fault surfaces in 3D seismic data

Abstract: We propose an efficient method for detecting and extracting fault surfaces in 3D-seismic volumes. The seismic data are transformed into a volume of local-fault-extraction ͑LFE͒ estimates that represents the likelihood that a given point lies on a fault surface. We partition the fault surfaces into relatively small linear portions, which are identified by analyzing tilted and rotated subvolumes throughout the region of interest. Directional filtering and thresholding further enhance the seismic discontinuities … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational cost of these recursive filters is independent of the spatial extent of their impulse responses, which may include well over 1000 samples in 3D images. This number represents the number of samples that contribute to the computation of fault likelihood for one orientation at one sample location in a 3D image (Cohen et al, 2006). With recursive smoothing filters I avoid this large factor in computational cost.…”
Section: Fault Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The computational cost of these recursive filters is independent of the spatial extent of their impulse responses, which may include well over 1000 samples in 3D images. This number represents the number of samples that contribute to the computation of fault likelihood for one orientation at one sample location in a 3D image (Cohen et al, 2006). With recursive smoothing filters I avoid this large factor in computational cost.…”
Section: Fault Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much like Cohen et al (2006), I scan over multiple fault strikes and dips to determine the orientation that maximizes fault likelihood. In the 3D examples shown in this paper, this scan included N f = 26 fault strikes f and N q = 22 fault dips q , for a total of N f N q = 572 possible fault orientations.…”
Section: Fault Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gibsen et al [6] proposed a multistep workflow of fault surface detection, which first grouped the highlighted fault points in local planar patches and then merged these patches into large fault surfaces. Cohen et al [7] applied multiple directional filters to enhance the contrast of the discontinuity cube and then used skeletonization to extract the thinning fault surfaces. More recently, a class of fault detection techniques were proposed and are based on the concept that faults can be described as structured edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some example approaches include texture classification approaches [4], coherence-based methods [5], filtering-based methods [6], and greedy optimization algorithms to extract dominant paths in seismic images [7]. Most of these methods do not seem to work well in the presence of high levels of noise.…”
Section: Related Work In Seismic Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%