2012
DOI: 10.1177/0954409712444840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and evaluation of rail surface defects using alternating current field measurement techniques

Abstract: Reliable and cost-effective inspection of rail tracks is of paramount importance to ensure the safety of rolling stock operations. In this paper alternating current field measurement (ACFM) sensors are used to carry out experiments on artificially induced rail surface defects at various speeds using testing configurations that simulate actual inspection conditions found in the field. From the obtained results it can be clearly seen that the ACFM sensors can detect the artificially induced rail surface defects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be difficult to interpret the information received during inspection, that is, to determine the relationship between the signals received from inspection hardware and the size of the defects under test. This task is nearly always complicated by the presence of clusters of multiple closely-spaced cracks compared to isolated cracks [16,17]. Following the fatal and economically damaging Hatfield, UK, rail derailment [18] inspection of the British railway network revealed more than 2000 sites of potentially serious RCF cracks [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be difficult to interpret the information received during inspection, that is, to determine the relationship between the signals received from inspection hardware and the size of the defects under test. This task is nearly always complicated by the presence of clusters of multiple closely-spaced cracks compared to isolated cracks [16,17]. Following the fatal and economically damaging Hatfield, UK, rail derailment [18] inspection of the British railway network revealed more than 2000 sites of potentially serious RCF cracks [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method, only reliably detects severe defects with cracks deeper than 5 mm. Other methods, such as visual inspection [7], alternating current field [8], image recognition [9], strain gage instrumented wheel [10], acoustic detection [11], and guided-wave-based health monitoring [12], have been proposed, each of which has different advantages in terms of cost, reliability, and robustness. This paper focuses on the use of axle box acceleration (ABA) measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, most degraded crossings are reactively replaced when they reach severe degradation. The limitations of manual inspection motivate the development of on-board monitoring technologies, such as ultrasonic measurement [ 4 , 5 ], eddy current testing [ 6 , 7 ], magnetic induction [ 8 ], image recognition [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], vibration-based inspection [ 12 , 13 ], guided-wave inspection [ 14 ], radio detection and ranging sensors [ 15 , 16 ], thermography [ 17 , 18 ], acoustic emission systems [ 19 , 20 ] and ground-penetrating radar [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%