2005
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2004.839538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Estimation of Improper Complex Random Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to utilize the improperness of s, we need to apply widely linear processing [8,9], the principle of which is not only to process r, but also its conjugated version r * in order to derive the filter output, i.e.,…”
Section: Improved Frequency Domain Receiver Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to utilize the improperness of s, we need to apply widely linear processing [8,9], the principle of which is not only to process r, but also its conjugated version r * in order to derive the filter output, i.e.,…”
Section: Improved Frequency Domain Receiver Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a complex random vector r, its second-order statistics are completely characterized by its autocorrelation matrix C rr = E[rr ℋ ] as well as the pseudo-autocorrelation matrix C rr = E[rr ] [19]. Most existing studies on receiver algorithms (including the one presented previously in Section III-A) only exploit the information contained in the autocorrelation function of the observed signal.…”
Section: B Improved Blind Mmse Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second-order properties of a complex random process are completely characterized by its autocorrelation function as well as the pseudo-autocorrelation function [10]. Most existing studies on receiver algorithms only exploit the information contained in the autocorrelation function of the observed signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a scenario arises when transmitting symbols with improper modulation formats (e.g., ASK and OQPSK) over complex channels. It was shown in Schreier et al [10] that the performance gain of WLP compared to conventional processing in terms of mean square error can be as large as a factor of 2. MIMO transceiver design was considered in Mattera et al [13], Sterle [14], where it was shown that when channel information is available both at the transmitter and receiver, joint design of the precoder and decoder using WLP yields considerable performance gains at the expense of a limited increase in the computational complexity, compared to the conventional linear transceiver in the scenario where real-valued symbols are transmitted over complex channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%