2003
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
238
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
9
238
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both of these outcomes represent a reduced ability to respond to important acoustic information. Research suggests that the threshold for discrimination is approximately 3 dB higher than for detection (Lohr et al 2003), and thus the physical space within which discrimination of a signal can occur may be much smaller than the previously stated reduction in listening area. This small window for signal discrimination may partially explain how responses were affected even at the relatively short signal-receiver distance of our experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, both of these outcomes represent a reduced ability to respond to important acoustic information. Research suggests that the threshold for discrimination is approximately 3 dB higher than for detection (Lohr et al 2003), and thus the physical space within which discrimination of a signal can occur may be much smaller than the previously stated reduction in listening area. This small window for signal discrimination may partially explain how responses were affected even at the relatively short signal-receiver distance of our experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our focus on the effects of acoustic masking from chronic noise at compressor sites in a natural system, as opposed to lab-based, intermittent, or experimentally introduced noise (Lohr et al 2003, Slabbekoorn and Peet 2003, Pohl et al 2009, Halfwerk et al 2011) provides needed field-based evidence that auditory surveillance is impaired by chronic noise. As well, this study is the first to consider responses of (Table 1), are marked with squares and surround the origin, representing the mean song.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Breeding pairs defend only a small area around their nest site, which is often in close proximity to nest sites of conspecifics (Lowther and Cink, 2006). Note, however, that it is unclear whether thresholds under more realistic, noisy conditions vary seasonally, because absolute thresholds do not necessarily predict thresholds in noise (Langemann et al, 1998;Lohr et al, 2003). Previous studies of seasonal auditory plasticity found no variation in thresholds of the plainfin midshipman and northern leopard frog (Sisneros et al, 2004;Goense and Feng, 2005) or in ABR latency of Carolina chickadees, house sparrows and tufted titmice (Lucas et al, 2002;Lucas et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%