2016
DOI: 10.5687/iscie.29.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Correction of Doppler Outliers in Kalman Filter-based Positioning

Abstract: In this paper, we propose methods of detecting Doppler outliers which cause positioning errors at Doppler-aided GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) positioning, and correcting the errors. We apply the existing detection method based on the innovation process in Kalman filtering to Doppler outlier problems, and we propose a novel detection method based on the measurements by the difference between C/A code pseudoranges and Doppler shift range-rates. Both methods are based on chi-squared tests. We apply tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach, using all samples under 6σ, implies that there remain delta-pose measurements with relatively large errors (i.e., greater than 3σ) in the sample distribution. However, it is assumed that a filter using these measurements will perform chi-squared (χ 2 ) or similar rejection for measurements with such large errors [22]. Otherwise, the selection of s would need to be exceedingly conservative, resulting in an undesirable distribution similar to Fig.…”
Section: B Selecting Scale Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach, using all samples under 6σ, implies that there remain delta-pose measurements with relatively large errors (i.e., greater than 3σ) in the sample distribution. However, it is assumed that a filter using these measurements will perform chi-squared (χ 2 ) or similar rejection for measurements with such large errors [22]. Otherwise, the selection of s would need to be exceedingly conservative, resulting in an undesirable distribution similar to Fig.…”
Section: B Selecting Scale Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%