Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.
A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP url' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. (0) 2476 574 880 Abstract Objective: This study compared the experience of viewing 3D medical images, 2D medical images and no image presented alongside a diagnosis. Methods: We conducted two laboratory experiments, each with 126 healthy participants. Participants heard three diagnoses; one accompanied by 3D medical images, one accompanied by 2D medical images and one with no image. Participants completed a questionnaire after each diagnosis rating their experience. In Experiment 2, half of the participants were informed that image interpretation can be susceptible to errors. Results: Participants preferred to view 3D images alongside a diagnosis (p<.001) and reported greater understanding (p<.001), perceived accuracy (p<.001) and increased trust (p<.001) when the diagnosis was accompanied by an image compared to no image. There was no significant difference in trust between participants who were informed of errors within image interpretation and those who were not. Conclusion: When presented alongside a diagnosis, medical images may aid patient understanding, recall and trust in medical information. Practical Considerations: Medical images may be a powerful resource for patients that could be utilised by clinicians during consultations.
KeywordsDoctor-patient communication; patient understanding; recall of medical information; patient trust in medical information.