Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and classification of subject-generated artifacts in EEG signals using autoregressive models

Abstract: We examine the problem of accurate detection and classification of artifacts in continuous EEG recordings. Manual identification of artifacts, by means of an expert or panel of experts, can be tedious, time-consuming and infeasible for large datasets. We use autoregressive (AR) models for feature extraction and characterization of EEG signals containing several kinds of subject-generated artifacts. AR model parameters are scale-invariant features that can be used to develop models of artifacts across a populat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected frequency bands correspond to the brainwaves theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-15 Hz), beta (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) and low gamma (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), where five-fold cross-validation has been used to select the best combination of these frequency bands. We extract d features from each band, where d is selected using the method in [72].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The selected frequency bands correspond to the brainwaves theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8-15 Hz), beta (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) and low gamma (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), where five-fold cross-validation has been used to select the best combination of these frequency bands. We extract d features from each band, where d is selected using the method in [72].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rest of the paper, it is assumed that the signals have already been pre-processed to remove noise and interferences. To this end, several techniques [25], such as autoregressive modeling [26], the more complex independent component analysis (ICA) [27], or the signal space projection (SSP) method [28], have shown good or excellent results (see also [29] and the references therein). Signal preprocessing includes also the division of the EEG into several frequency bands that are separately analyzed [30,31].…”
Section: Eeg Measurement and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Autoregressive (AR) methods have been used in a number of studies to model EEG data by representing the signal at each channel as a linear combination of the signal at previous time points [30]. AR models provide a compact, computationally efficient representation of EEG signals.…”
Section: Autoregressive (Ar) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are techniques, which are based in thresholds applied in time or frequency domain like in [3]. Some others are based in a supervised learning method using statistical [4] or autoregressive (AR) [5] features. Other methods, like [6], use a combination of feature extraction and data driven thresholds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%