2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and Classification of Novel Renal Histologic Phenotypes Using Deep Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sub-set of miRNAs allows LSTM to group kidney cancer miRNAs into five sub-types with an average accuracy of about 95% and Matthews's correlation coefficient values of about 0.92 under 10 random clustered 5 times, which are very close to the average output of all miRNAs for rating purposes. Sheehan et al [22] introduced the Deep Neural Network (DNN) for the detection and classification of novel renal histologic phenotypes. They demonstrate that machine learning with DNN has strong widespread performance in several processing tasks of histologic images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sub-set of miRNAs allows LSTM to group kidney cancer miRNAs into five sub-types with an average accuracy of about 95% and Matthews's correlation coefficient values of about 0.92 under 10 random clustered 5 times, which are very close to the average output of all miRNAs for rating purposes. Sheehan et al [22] introduced the Deep Neural Network (DNN) for the detection and classification of novel renal histologic phenotypes. They demonstrate that machine learning with DNN has strong widespread performance in several processing tasks of histologic images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it was proven that the usage of the ML algorithm can not only clearly segment the glomeruli from the kidney image but also distinguish the renal tubule. Sheehan et al [ 34 ] used SVM classification to extract the features of renal tubules in mice (true positive rate, 92%; false-positive rate, 10%). Using 200 cores on the Vermont Advanced Compute Cluster, the glomerular segmentation pipeline can segment the full-sized mouse kidney section in approximately 40 min, allowing analysis of more glomeruli than manual completion.…”
Section: In Nephrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size of the study is generally small, and the pictures used for modeling are basically from pathological sections of the kidneys of mice. [ 32 , 34 ] Although AI has developed rapidly, due to the complexity of pathological manifestations of various renal diseases and their close relationship with clinical indicators, the automated pathological diagnosis of specific renal diseases based on images has not yet been published. It is not possible to completely replace pathologists for the renal pathological diagnosis of all kinds of kidney diseases through comprehensive patient information.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QIFs were extracted from the intermediate 'fully connected layer 6' from AlexNet, which outputs 4096 QIFs. We recently showed that these 4096 features work well for transfer learning in histopathological studies of kidney disease [20]. AlexNet has a fixed input size of 227 × 227 pixels (~0.16 mm 2 ), thus randomly sampled 227 × 227-pixel image patches from the dermis of each section were transformed into QIFs.…”
Section: Deep Neural Network Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%