2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and classification of matrix cracking in laminated composites using guided wave propagation and artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] For example, Dahmen et al 32 investigated the elastic properties of olive wood plates using the Lamb and bulk ultrasonic wave propagation methods. Mardanshahi et al 38 used the Lamb wave propagation and artificial intelligence methods to propose an intelligent model for the detection and classification of the matrix cracking in polymer composites. Fathi et al 34,35 assessed the sensitivity of Lamb waves to the MC variation beyond the fiber saturation point through the estimation of the elastic and viscoelastic properties of green poplar wood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] For example, Dahmen et al 32 investigated the elastic properties of olive wood plates using the Lamb and bulk ultrasonic wave propagation methods. Mardanshahi et al 38 used the Lamb wave propagation and artificial intelligence methods to propose an intelligent model for the detection and classification of the matrix cracking in polymer composites. Fathi et al 34,35 assessed the sensitivity of Lamb waves to the MC variation beyond the fiber saturation point through the estimation of the elastic and viscoelastic properties of green poplar wood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, different Lamb wave modes and excitation frequencies can be utilized for the detection of various types of defects and damage with different sizes and geometry. The guided wave propagation method has been extensively used for the characterization of different types of materials and structures and damage detection purposes 32–48 . For example, Dahmen et al 32 investigated the elastic properties of olive wood plates using the Lamb and bulk ultrasonic wave propagation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML models predict the MOE and MOR of the UV-degraded wood specimens in the longitudinal direction using the parameters listed in Table 1. Utilizing ML for developing datadriven models has been practiced for properties prediction, 22,53 damage and fault detection, 37 and health monitoring of materials and structures. 44,45,54,55 It accounts for materials and process high variability and facilitates developing intelligent in-situ monitoring models.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lamb wave velocity is related to the elastic properties of the propagation medium, and the decay in the displacement amplitude with the propagation distance is related to its viscoelastic properties. 37 The Lamb wave propagation method has been extensively used for damage detection and characterization of different types of materials and structures. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] For example, Dahmen et al 38 investigated the elastic properties of olive wood plates using the Lamb and bulk ultrasonic wave propagation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent breakthrough in computation and artificial intelligence provides a new solution for porosity prediction. e machine learning method has been proved to be a powerful tool to deal with complex multiparameter and nonlinear problems, especially for dealing with highly nonlinear noise and incomplete data sets [21][22][23]. In recent years, machine learning approaches such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been widely used in the nondestructive testing area [24][25][26], especially for the porosity characterization of thermal barrier coatings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%