2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.111090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and classification of bruises of pears based on thermal images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In 43 of the 71 papers that used CA as a metric, most of the accuracy was higher than 90%, indicating good performance. The highest CA results had values higher than 98%, constituting remarkable results, which were obtained by Amara et al 41 (99.72% with a LeNet model), Feng et al 87 (99.62-100% with a CNN), Zeng et al 36 (99.25% with a modified LeNet model), Brahimi et al 46 (99.18% with GoogLeNet and 98.66% with AlexNet), Alruwaili et al 98 (99.11% with a modified AlexNet model), Neupane et al 78 (98.7% with the Faster R-CNN Inception-V2 model), Giefer et al 56 (98.36% with the VGG-16 model), Karthik et al 92 (98% with a residual CNN), Bauer et al 105 (higher than 98% with a CNN), and Sun et al 100 (93.3%–100% with a DBN). Of the surveyed papers, the results obtained by Zhang et al 85 had the lowest CA (77.8%–84.5% with an FCN model); however, the SVM model used in this particular task (the detection of internal bruises in blueberries) also obtained a low CA (22.5%–67.9%).…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In 43 of the 71 papers that used CA as a metric, most of the accuracy was higher than 90%, indicating good performance. The highest CA results had values higher than 98%, constituting remarkable results, which were obtained by Amara et al 41 (99.72% with a LeNet model), Feng et al 87 (99.62-100% with a CNN), Zeng et al 36 (99.25% with a modified LeNet model), Brahimi et al 46 (99.18% with GoogLeNet and 98.66% with AlexNet), Alruwaili et al 98 (99.11% with a modified AlexNet model), Neupane et al 78 (98.7% with the Faster R-CNN Inception-V2 model), Giefer et al 56 (98.36% with the VGG-16 model), Karthik et al 92 (98% with a residual CNN), Bauer et al 105 (higher than 98% with a CNN), and Sun et al 100 (93.3%–100% with a DBN). Of the surveyed papers, the results obtained by Zhang et al 85 had the lowest CA (77.8%–84.5% with an FCN model); however, the SVM model used in this particular task (the detection of internal bruises in blueberries) also obtained a low CA (22.5%–67.9%).…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The property of a highly hierarchical structure along with the massive learning capability of deep-learning models enables them to carry out predictions and classifications particularly well with good flexibility and adaptability to a wide range of highly complicated data analysis tasks 28 . With the robust capability of automatic feature learning, many complex problems in the field of horticultural science can be solved in an effective and rapid way by utilizing deep-learning methods, includin g various recognition 29 31 , yield estimation 32 , 33 , quality detection 27 , 34 , stress phenotyping detection 35 , 36 , growth monitoring 37 , 38 , and other applications 39 , 40 . In the next section, we introduce these applications in detail.…”
Section: Brief Overview Of Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evrişimsel sinir ağlarına termal kameradan aldıkları görüntüleri girdi olarak vermişler ve yaraları, ezikleri tespit etmişlerdir. %99.25'lik bir doğrulukla başarılı sonuçlar elde etmişlerdir [14]. Zhao ve arkadaşları [15], nanegiller ailesinden olan sağlık ve gıda sektöründe kullanılan Perilla bitkisinin makine öğrenmesi ile sınıflandırılması işlemini gerçekleştirmişlerdir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified