2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and characterization of mosaicism in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Abstract: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is an inherited, progressive nephropathy accounting for 4-10% of end stage renal disease worldwide. PKD1 and PKD2 are the most common disease loci, but even accounting for other genetic causes, about 7% of families remain unresolved. Typically, these unsolved cases have relatively mild kidney disease and often have a negative family history. Mosaicism, due to de novo mutation in the early embryo, has rarely been identified by conventional genetic analysis of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The entire coding and flanking intronic regions of PKD1 and PKD2 were screened for mutations by Sanger or next generation sequencing as previously described. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Patients were classified as follows: PKD1 truncating ( PKD1 T ), PKD1 nontruncating ( PKD1 NT ), and PKD2 . PKD1 NT mutations were subcategorized to PKD1 NT1 and PKD1 NT2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire coding and flanking intronic regions of PKD1 and PKD2 were screened for mutations by Sanger or next generation sequencing as previously described. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 Patients were classified as follows: PKD1 truncating ( PKD1 T ), PKD1 nontruncating ( PKD1 NT ), and PKD2 . PKD1 NT mutations were subcategorized to PKD1 NT1 and PKD1 NT2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details about the TNGS panel employed in Mayo have been published recently. 33 All changes were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. When family samples were available, segregation analysis of the variant of interest was performed.…”
Section: Molecular Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutation screening was performed by Sanger sequencing or employing a next-generation sequencing panel (11,43,44). Patients with PKD1 mutations were categorized into truncating (PKD1 T ; inactivating; previously termed MSG1) or nontruncating changes predicted to be fully penetrant (PKD1 NT1 ; MSG2) or hypomorphic (PKD1 NT2 ; MSG3).…”
Section: Genetic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with a clinical ADPKD phenotype seen at Mayo Clinic, genetically defined as PKD1 or PKD2 and with a typical MIC, were considered for the Analysis Cohort (N = 1328; Figure 1). Subjects with complex genotypes or missing clinical data within the timescale of the study were excluded, leaving 1079 for the renal survival analysis (Figure 1) (33,44). Other exclusions were implemented depending on the measured outcome ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Study Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%