1990
DOI: 10.1016/0888-0786(90)90057-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection and characterisation of circulating cysticercal antigens in human cerebrospinal fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-speci¢c binding of human (CSF/serum) and rabbit proteins and heterophile activity of sheep erythrocytes in human CSFs were eliminated by absorbing each CSF with 10% control cells in RPHA, while in immunoblotting blotted membranes were incubated with 2% normal rabbit serum. The sensitivity limit of RPHA was 400 ng ml 31 while it was 45 ng ml 31 in our previous studies [21]. Variation in the sensitivity limit of RPHA may be due to di¡erences in titers of antibodies formed against each antigenic component in di¡erent hosts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Non-speci¢c binding of human (CSF/serum) and rabbit proteins and heterophile activity of sheep erythrocytes in human CSFs were eliminated by absorbing each CSF with 10% control cells in RPHA, while in immunoblotting blotted membranes were incubated with 2% normal rabbit serum. The sensitivity limit of RPHA was 400 ng ml 31 while it was 45 ng ml 31 in our previous studies [21]. Variation in the sensitivity limit of RPHA may be due to di¡erences in titers of antibodies formed against each antigenic component in di¡erent hosts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Non‐specific binding of human (CSF/serum) and rabbit proteins and heterophile activity of sheep erythrocytes in human CSFs were eliminated by absorbing each CSF with 10% control cells in RPHA, while in immunoblotting blotted membranes were incubated with 2% normal rabbit serum. The sensitivity limit of RPHA was 400 ng ml −1 while it was 45 ng ml −1 in our previous studies [21]. Variation in the sensitivity limit of RPHA may be due to differences in titers of antibodies formed against each antigenic component in different hosts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The relative merits of antigen detection versus antibody analysis have been reviewed elsewhere [7]. My colleagues and I selectively demonstrated 2 cysticercal antigens in human CSF from patients with proven NCC, with molecular masses of 24-28 and 64-68 kDa, of which the 24-28 kDa antigen was found to be highly specific [8].…”
Section: Assessment Of Specificity Of a Recombinant 10-kda Protein Anmentioning
confidence: 99%