“…The few available studies have assessed cfDNA on a very limited number of samples, either directly with the use of quantitative PCR (custom or validated TaqMan genotype assays) for the amplification of multicopy genes on chromosomes 17 and Y or the combined detection of specific gene variants and multiple SNPs surrounding them [ 61 , 82 ]. In other studies, whole genome amplification (PicoPlex or RepliG multiple displacement amplification, MDA) was followed by PCR for the amplification of specific regions of selected genes ( TCIRG1, SCN5A, RHO, EXTL1, SLC4A1, VWF, HSF4, NPC1, PTCH1, EPS8L3, SMN1, SRY, ACTB, PAH ) and validation of a couple of these by sequencing [ 58 , 82 , 83 ]. These studies, reviewed and summarized in a table in Leaver and Wells 2020, have demonstrated the possibility of cfDNA detection in BF but also underlined the limitations associated with variable and low detection rate, even after WGA, ranging from 42.9-84% (much lower in comparison to the ~95% efficiency WGA efficiency achieved from biopsied cells), increased allele dropout, risk of maternal contamination, lack of consistency and reliability [ 84 ].…”