2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2024.104390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection algorithm for dense small objects in high altitude image

Mingjie Wu,
Lijun Yun,
Yibo Wang
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the drawbacks of the detection head in the YOLO algorithm is that, since the detection head typically operates at the final layer of the network, it may miss some low-level detailed information. This can result in lower detection accuracy, particularly for small objects or in complex scenes [48,49]. Therefore, we redesigned the detection head of YOLO and thoroughly analyzed the performance of the detection head in w-YOLO.…”
Section: Detection Layer Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the drawbacks of the detection head in the YOLO algorithm is that, since the detection head typically operates at the final layer of the network, it may miss some low-level detailed information. This can result in lower detection accuracy, particularly for small objects or in complex scenes [48,49]. Therefore, we redesigned the detection head of YOLO and thoroughly analyzed the performance of the detection head in w-YOLO.…”
Section: Detection Layer Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section will further compare HeMoDU with current typical methods on the Visdrone2019 dataset and the UA-DETRAC dataset to verify its superior performance. We compare HeMoDU with YOLOv3 [19], YOLOv4 [20], Li et al [35], DFE-Net [36], EM-YOLO [37], YOLOv8s [34], and EdgeYOLO [38] on the Visdrone2019 dataset and with YOLOv5s, YOLOv5-NAM [39], Peng et al [40], and YOLOv8s on the UA-DETRAC dataset.…”
Section: Comparative Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%