1997
DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199703000-00255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Vascular Access Dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a number of factors may be responsible [16][17][18][19][20], undiagnosed inflow lesions may be a contributory factor. In this study, only 9% (15/174 cases) failed to increase the access flow by more than 20% after angioplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of factors may be responsible [16][17][18][19][20], undiagnosed inflow lesions may be a contributory factor. In this study, only 9% (15/174 cases) failed to increase the access flow by more than 20% after angioplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common underlying cause of access failure is venous neointimal hyperplasia leading to access stenosis and thrombosis [1]. A number of studies have shown that access monitoring using noninvasive tests such as intra-access pressure, access flow rate, or duplex ultrasound examination can detect the presence of stenosis before it leads to thrombosis [2][3][4][5][6][7]. In addition, early prospective observational studies found that regular access monitoring to detect and treat stenosis could decrease the rate of access thrombosis and might prolong access patency [2][3][4]8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the majority of our dialysis patients have a native fistula [15], blood flow monitoring was chosen as the monitoring technique of choice [5]. A highly trained technician performed the access flow measurements but the attending nephrologist for each patient made the ultimate access management decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIAPR method is based on the presumption that high SIAPR is an indirect indicator of low Qa associated with hemodynamically significant stenosis [2,3], and the value and utility of SIAPR for surveillance is therefore dependent on such a relationship existing between SIAPR and Qa. In fact, a number of studies have suggested that no correlation exists between SIAPR and Qa [5][6][7][8][9][10], while others suggest that this relationship does exist [2,3,11,12]. We could not find a published mathematical or theoretical basis for a correlation or surrogate relationship between SIAPR and Qa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%