2022
DOI: 10.1089/big.2021.0193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Unbiased Associations in Large Data Sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2020, equitability was characterized again in terms of interval estimates [ 8 ]. Since MIC may overestimate the correlated value, which leads to the misidentification of the relationship without noiseless, to detect unbiased associations, Liu proposed unbiased correlation measure weighted information coefficient mean (WICM) [ 18 ]. To quantify the dependence between two random vectors of possibly different dimensions, Mordant proposed two coefficients that are based on the Wasserstein distance between the actual distribution and a reference distribution with independent components, but they were not designed with the goal of equitability [ 19 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, equitability was characterized again in terms of interval estimates [ 8 ]. Since MIC may overestimate the correlated value, which leads to the misidentification of the relationship without noiseless, to detect unbiased associations, Liu proposed unbiased correlation measure weighted information coefficient mean (WICM) [ 18 ]. To quantify the dependence between two random vectors of possibly different dimensions, Mordant proposed two coefficients that are based on the Wasserstein distance between the actual distribution and a reference distribution with independent components, but they were not designed with the goal of equitability [ 19 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%