2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.10980
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting transition between Abelian and non-Abelian topological orders through symmetric tensor networks

Yu-Hsueh Chen,
Ching-Yu Huang,
Ying-Jer Kao

Abstract: We propose a unified scheme to identify phase transitions out of the Z2 Abelian topological order, including the transition to a non-Abelian chiral spin liquid. Using loop gas and and string gas states [H.-Y. Lee, R. Kaneko, T. Okubo, N. Kawashima, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 087203 (2019)] on the star lattice Kitaev model as an example, we compute the overlap of minimally entangled states through transfer matrices. We demonstrate that, similar to the anyon condensation, continuous deformation of a Z2-injective proj… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, we find that the LG projector for the integer spins only supports dispersive excitations belonging to the vacuum-and charge-sectors, while the flux-and fermion-sector excitations are static. This is intrinsically different from the half-integer LG projector, where only vacuum and fermion anyon excitations are dispersive [37]. Interestingly, this is consistent with the argument put forth in Ref.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, we find that the LG projector for the integer spins only supports dispersive excitations belonging to the vacuum-and charge-sectors, while the flux-and fermion-sector excitations are static. This is intrinsically different from the half-integer LG projector, where only vacuum and fermion anyon excitations are dispersive [37]. Interestingly, this is consistent with the argument put forth in Ref.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…[12] up to a phase factor. Note that a Z 2 -invariant PEPS does not necessarily guarantee a Z 2 topologically ordered phase, for the system can be driven into a trivial [30,35] or even a non-Abelian [36,37] phase by a physical deformation of the local tensor. This property makes it as a suitable ansätz to study whether the system harbors a QSL phase and identify possible topological transitions [36,38,39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%