2013
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6427.12022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting therapeutic improvement early in therapy: validation of the SCORE‐15 index of family functioning and change

Abstract: The SCORE index of family functioning and change is an established measure, with strong psychometric properties, of the quality of family life. We report the sensitivity to therapeutic change of the short form, the SCORE-15. Data are reported from 584 participants aged above 11 years, representing 239 families. All couples and families had been referred for systemic couples and family therapy, completing the form at start of the first session and close to the fourth. The SCORE-15 is shown to be acceptable with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
102
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
10
102
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Items are rated on a 5‐point likert scale ranging from ‘describes us very well’ to ‘describes us not at all’, with lower scores indicating better functioning. The Score‐15 has been found to have good internal consistency, .89 (n = 515), and sensitivity to clinical change in a large clinical sample (Stratton et al , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items are rated on a 5‐point likert scale ranging from ‘describes us very well’ to ‘describes us not at all’, with lower scores indicating better functioning. The Score‐15 has been found to have good internal consistency, .89 (n = 515), and sensitivity to clinical change in a large clinical sample (Stratton et al , ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we include them here in the spirit of sharing the experiences (including the pitfalls) of developing innovative methods to evaluate innovative services to reduce recurrent care proceedings. This is relatively uncharted territory in the sense that, methodologically, it falls between a mature literature on psychologically informed parenting interventions (see, for example, van der Ende, van Busschbach, Nicholson, Korevaar, & van Weeghel, 2014;Stratton et al, 2010Stratton et al, , 2014) and a mature literature on psychologically informed empowerment interventions (see, for example, Rogers, Ralph, & Salzer, 2010;Rogers et al, 1997). One clear lesson here is that, as evaluators, we needed to be more mindful of the potentially disempowering effects of methods intended to evidence empowerment.…”
Section: Self-report Clinical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary outcome measures included the HADS (Zigmond and Snaith., 1983), Score-15 (Stratton et al, 2014) and a bespoke questionnaire eliciting health service usage in order to gain insight into the economic implications of the intervention. Demographic information was collected at baseline.…”
Section: Participants and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%