2020
DOI: 10.5194/amt-13-6645-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting the melting layer with a micro rain radar using a neural network approach

Abstract: Abstract. A new method to determine the melting layer height using a micro rain radar (MRR) is presented. The MRR is a small vertically pointing frequency-modulated continuous-wave radar that measures Doppler spectra of precipitation. From these Doppler spectra, various variables such as Doppler velocity or spectral width can be derived. The melting layer is visible due to higher reflectivity and an acceleration of the falling particles, among others. These characteristics are fed to a neural network to determ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MRR was originally deployed and evaluated for measuring rainfall in remote regions (Maahn & Kollias, 2012; Peters et al., 2002). In addition, MRR observations have been used in identifying melting in stratiform rain (Brast & Markmann, 2020; Cha et al., 2009; Garcia‐Benadi et al., 2020). The MRR observations were processed using the Maahn and Kollias (2012) method providing 1‐min resolution of equivalent radar reflectivity (Ze; dBZ), Doppler velocity ( V d ; ms −1 ) and spectral width (ms −1 ).…”
Section: Instrumentation and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MRR was originally deployed and evaluated for measuring rainfall in remote regions (Maahn & Kollias, 2012; Peters et al., 2002). In addition, MRR observations have been used in identifying melting in stratiform rain (Brast & Markmann, 2020; Cha et al., 2009; Garcia‐Benadi et al., 2020). The MRR observations were processed using the Maahn and Kollias (2012) method providing 1‐min resolution of equivalent radar reflectivity (Ze; dBZ), Doppler velocity ( V d ; ms −1 ) and spectral width (ms −1 ).…”
Section: Instrumentation and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have explored implications for local hydrology (Henn et al., 2020; Lundquist et al., 2008; White et al., 2002), glaciology (Perry et al., 2017; Schauwecker et al., 2017), and microphysical differences between rain with and without a bright band (Lin et al., 2020; Martner et al., 2008). Methods for identifying melting through vertically profiling radar observations use variables including reflectivity (Cha et al., 2009), Doppler velocity (Perry et al., 2017), Doppler spectra skewness (Garcia‐Benadi et al., 2020), and neural networks (Brast & Markmann, 2020). Weather radars employ other methods using dual polarization capabilities to identify melting (Giangrande et al., 2008; Matrosov et al., 2017; Ryzhkov & Zrnic, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximums mostly relate to BB. There are many methods for automatic detection of the ML, but they can be found easily on the radar reflectivity diagrams by the BB position (Brast & Markmann, 2020). The current case occurred from 08 UTC December 5 to 03 UTC December 6, when wet snow and rain were observed.…”
Section: Model Conformity Check and Observation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the temperature of the lower layers of air is positive, the falling snow melts and transforms into rain. The layer where this transformation takes place is called the melting layer (ML) (Drummond et al, 1996), commonly investigated by radars (Brast & Markmann, 2020). Due to the high reflectivity of wet snow, the ML is seen in a radar scan as the well-known "bright band" (BB) (Aus tin & Bemis, 1950).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ML product is calculated using an Artificial Intelligence approach [41], providing probability values; a probability greater than 0.75 is considered a reliable ML height determination, being the maximum probability of the selected height for the melting level. The BB peak has been described in Section 3.…”
Section: Manufacturer ML Height Vs Raprom-pro Bb Peak Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%