2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4789508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting the local transport properties and the dimensionality of transport of epitaxial graphene by a multi-point probe approach

Abstract: The electronic transport properties of epitaxial monolayer graphene (MLG) and hydrogen-intercalated quasi free-standing bilayer graphene (QFBLG) on SiC(0001) are investigated by micro multi-point probes. Using a probe with 12 contacts, we perform four-point probe measurements with the possibility to effectively vary the contact spacing over more than one order of magnitude, allowing us to establish that the transport is purely two-dimensional. Combined with the carrier density obtained by angle-resolved photoe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four-probe spectroscopy measurement with variable probe distances is the method of choice for studying materials where both surface and bulk contributions to electrical conduction are present. The common practice is to assume two decoupled conduction channels corresponding to the 2D conductance of surface states and the 3D conductance of bulk, as schematically shown in Figure a, and deduce the dominant conduction mechanism through the dependence of the conductance with probe spacing. Such an assumption would only be valid if the potential profile across the surface were identical for both 2D and 3D conduction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four-probe spectroscopy measurement with variable probe distances is the method of choice for studying materials where both surface and bulk contributions to electrical conduction are present. The common practice is to assume two decoupled conduction channels corresponding to the 2D conductance of surface states and the 3D conductance of bulk, as schematically shown in Figure a, and deduce the dominant conduction mechanism through the dependence of the conductance with probe spacing. Such an assumption would only be valid if the potential profile across the surface were identical for both 2D and 3D conduction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to compare these results to those from epitaxial graphene grown on the silicon face of SiC, both because graphene is a similar Dirac-material but also because this system has been measured with the same 4STM and 12pp techniques. The reported results are remarkably similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graphene sample investigated in this work was produced following a well-documented synthesis method that provides high-quality monolayer graphene on the Siterminated face of SiC(0001). The graphene layer was decoupled from the substrate by hydrogen intercalation [36,37] such that the structural and electronic properties probed by transport, Raman and ARPES measurements closely approached pristine graphene [37][38][39][40]. The graphene is p-doped with a carrier concentration of ≈ 5 × 10 12 cm −2 that places the Dirac point 240 meV above the Fermi energy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graphene layer was decoupled from the substrate by hydrogen intercalation [36,37] such that the structural and electronic properties probed by transport, Raman and ARPES measurements closely approached pristine graphene [37][38][39][40]. The graphene is p-doped with a carrier concentration of ≈ 5 × 10 12 cm −2 that places the Dirac point 240 meV above the Fermi energy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%