2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting the intertidal morphologic change using satellite data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
69
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is perhaps due to development of the science partially out of earlier remote sensing of inland lacustrine freshwater wetlands, where water level changes are typically less significant. However, some studies have used a sequence of satellite images to build an elevation model based on tidal inundation, although this method depends on known water levels at the time of image acquisition [227][228][229]. One variation uses a large number of images to overcome this challenge and reconstruct estimated topography from historical imagery taken at different, unknown flood levels [188,189].…”
Section: Freshwater Tidal Wetlands and Deltasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is perhaps due to development of the science partially out of earlier remote sensing of inland lacustrine freshwater wetlands, where water level changes are typically less significant. However, some studies have used a sequence of satellite images to build an elevation model based on tidal inundation, although this method depends on known water levels at the time of image acquisition [227][228][229]. One variation uses a large number of images to overcome this challenge and reconstruct estimated topography from historical imagery taken at different, unknown flood levels [188,189].…”
Section: Freshwater Tidal Wetlands and Deltasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to overcoming this challenge is to use information contained in other data sets to derive the sense of the topographic changes. The waterline method has been a useful way of doing so, using the extent of flooding seen in multiple optical images of a site taken at different water levels to effectively contour the topography [227][228][229]. This method relies upon knowing the water levels at the remote sensing imaging times, however, which is difficult for long or old imagery time series and in ungauged field locations.…”
Section: Landsat Records Of Topographic State Bifurcation In the Wax mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the mean slope of a typical intertidal zone ranges between 1‰ and 3‰, the total positional error (1.5 pixels) may result in vertical errors of 4.5-13.5 cm on a 30 m resolution satellite image. Furthermore, the positional error introduced in the geo-correction and waterline extraction of the images and its influence on the accuracy has been discussed in the literature [20,32,35]; hence, this factor is not a focus of this study.…”
Section: Potential Errors In the Waterline Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific applications of high precision mapping of tidal flats have been achieved in some countries using Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) from aircraft [4,8]. However, these methods are limited for application over continental scales because of rapidly changing tidal conditions and the high cost of airborne acquisitions [3,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of methods to establish the location of waterline have been developed, including manual digitization [10,11], edge detection [12], density slicing [9,13] and multi-band classification [14]. By delineating the waterline at known tide heights, digital elevation models for the intertidal zone can be developed and tidal flats mapped to high accuracy [9]. However, if the aim is to map the extent of tidal flats, these methods are only suitable for areas where there is tide height information for the precise time of data capture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%