2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61527-7_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Temporal Anomalies in Business Processes Using Distance-Based Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-As discussed in Rogge-Solti and Kasneci (2014), Mavroudopoulos and Gounaris (2020) it is hard to interpret whether temporal event anomalies are true anomalies or measurement errors. In the latter case, the timestamp of an event has been falsely logged, causing an event to appear as outlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…-As discussed in Rogge-Solti and Kasneci (2014), Mavroudopoulos and Gounaris (2020) it is hard to interpret whether temporal event anomalies are true anomalies or measurement errors. In the latter case, the timestamp of an event has been falsely logged, causing an event to appear as outlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, this is (most probably) a measurement error and has to be distinguished from real outliers. We have directly tackled this issue in our previous work (Mavroudopoulos and Gounaris 2020), and the main results are orthogonal to the exact proximity-based outlier detection. More specifically, we advocate, after detecting an outlier in a trace, to check whether the immediate successor is an outlier as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations