2017
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting splicing patterns in genes involved in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

Abstract: Interpretation of variants of unknown significance (VUS) is a major challenge for laboratories performing molecular diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), especially considering that many genes are now known to be involved in this syndrome. One important way these VUS can have a functional impact is through their effects on RNA splicing. Here we present a custom RNA-Seq assay plus bioinformatics and biostatistics pipeline to analyse specifically alternative and abnormal splicing junctions in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
63
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(53 reference statements)
5
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To accomplish this, BRCA1/2 genes were used as controls since extensive analysis of the splice isoforms repertoire of these genes was previously conducted using PCRbased techniques 21,22 and recently also by targeted RNA-seq. 31 Our results show that the approach used in our study was able to identify almost all previously described BRCA1/2 splicing events, i.e. 93% of the splicing events were detected with our standard analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To accomplish this, BRCA1/2 genes were used as controls since extensive analysis of the splice isoforms repertoire of these genes was previously conducted using PCRbased techniques 21,22 and recently also by targeted RNA-seq. 31 Our results show that the approach used in our study was able to identify almost all previously described BRCA1/2 splicing events, i.e. 93% of the splicing events were detected with our standard analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Overall our method allowed to detect more known events than a previous targeted RNA-seq study. 31 Nevertheless, we did not find 2 BRCA1 and 1 BRCA2 junctions described in that study. So, we aligned the raw reads to the already known events not found by the STAR aligner and visually inspected the outcome.…”
Section: Performance Testcontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Isoform Δ18 is a minor event detected only in HUVH carrier (SF 7.2%) and in HUVH/HCSC controls (SF 4.2% and 1.4%, respectively); isoform Δ16‐18 was only detected in HUVH due to primer location and displayed no notable differences between carrier and controls (SF 13.1% and 11.1%, respectively); and putative isoform ▼17q 224 was only detected in HCSC samples, although not in all RT‐PCR assays, and showed higher levels in HCSC carrier (SF 17.1%) compared to controls (1.2%; Figure a). Two previous studies detected Δ17,18 and Δ18 in control lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) and normal breast tissue, with Δ17,18 being more abundant (Davy et al., ; Fackenthal et al., ). Normalized CE data from full‐length transcript (FL) showed a two‐fold reduction in carriers compared to controls, suggesting that the variant allele is not producing FL (Figure b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%