2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting spatially non-stationary and scale-dependent relationships between urban landscape fragmentation and related factors using Geographically Weighted Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
97
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When SI<1, the explanatory variable y and dependent variable x reach spatial stationarity (Gao and Li 2011). To identify the scale dependence of spatial nonstationarity in local parameter coefficients, we iterated the GWR model with increasing fixed kernel bandwidth from 25 to 1,500 km as the search radius.…”
Section: Measuring Nonstationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When SI<1, the explanatory variable y and dependent variable x reach spatial stationarity (Gao and Li 2011). To identify the scale dependence of spatial nonstationarity in local parameter coefficients, we iterated the GWR model with increasing fixed kernel bandwidth from 25 to 1,500 km as the search radius.…”
Section: Measuring Nonstationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, as an extension of traditional standard global regression techniques, geographically weighted regression (GWR) was developed to explore spatially varying relationships (Brunsdon et al 1998;Fotheringham et al 2002). A few studies have confirmed the analytical efficacy of GWR for investigating spatially varying relationships in some research fields, such as climatology (Brunsdon et al 2001), ecological inference problem (Calvo and Escolar 2003), forests (Shi et al 2006b), urban poverty (Longley and Tobón 2004), environmental justice (Mennis and Jordan 2005), urban land surface temperature (Li et al 2010), and urban landscape fragmentation (Gao and Li 2011). In recent years, a limited number of studies extended its scope into relationships between vegetation and climate (Gao et al 2012a, b;Gaughan et al 2012;Propastin et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, residuals of both OLS and GWR results were analysed using global Moran's I to test for spatial autocorrelation. If the results of global Moran's I on the residuals show significant p-values, there is spatial autocorrelation present and the results of the analysis may be unreliable (Brunsdon, Fotheringham, & Charlton, 1998;Fotheringham et al, 2002;Gao & Li, 2010). …”
Section: Global and Local Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike OLS and spatial regression, in GWR the relationships between the independent and dependent variables are not assumed to be the same at all locations (Gao & Li, 2011). One of the common problems with estimating global regression models, like OLS and spatial regression, for spatial data are that 14 variations over space that might exist in the data are suppressed (Cahill & Mulligan, 2007).…”
Section: Modelling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%