2021
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting spatially co-expressed gene clusters with functional coherence by graph-regularized convolutional neural network

Abstract: Motivation Clustering spatial-resolved gene expressions is an essential analysis to reveal gene activities in the underlying morphological context by their functional roles. However, conventional clustering analysis does not consider gene expression co-localizations in tissue for detecting spatial expression patterns or functional relationships among the genes for biological interpretation in the spatial context. In this paper, we present a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) regularized by th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To systematically evaluate this ability, we utilize twelve human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) 10x Visium datasets (10x-hDLPFC) (16) and a mouse hippocampus Slide-seqV2 dataset (ssq-mHippo) (17), as listed in SI Appendix , Table S1. We benchmark SpaCEX against four state-of-the-art competing methods: CNN-PReg (18), Giotto (19), Spark (20) and STUtility (21) ( SI Appendix , Table S2). Our initial assessment involves visualizing spatial expression maps of four randomly selected genes from each of two SpaCEX-identified clusters, chosen to represent high and medium quality clusters, respectively (see “Identifying groups of spatially co-expressed genes” in Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To systematically evaluate this ability, we utilize twelve human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) 10x Visium datasets (10x-hDLPFC) (16) and a mouse hippocampus Slide-seqV2 dataset (ssq-mHippo) (17), as listed in SI Appendix , Table S1. We benchmark SpaCEX against four state-of-the-art competing methods: CNN-PReg (18), Giotto (19), Spark (20) and STUtility (21) ( SI Appendix , Table S2). Our initial assessment involves visualizing spatial expression maps of four randomly selected genes from each of two SpaCEX-identified clusters, chosen to represent high and medium quality clusters, respectively (see “Identifying groups of spatially co-expressed genes” in Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1. We benchmark SpaCEX against four state-of-the-art competing methods: CNN-PReg (18), Giotto (19), Spark (20) and STUtility (21) (SI Appendix, Table S2). Our initial assessment involves visualizing spatial expression maps of four randomly selected genes from each of two SpaCEX-identified clusters, chosen to represent high and medium quality clusters, respectively (see "Identifying groups of spatially co-expressed genes" in Methods).…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model outperformed existing models on a benchmark dataset and accurately predicted PPIs for unknown viruses. Song et al [ 60 ] proposed a method for clustering spatially resolved gene expression data using a graph-regularized convolutional neural network. This method leverages the graph of a PPI network, improving the coherence of spatial patterns and providing biological interpretation of the gene clusters in the spatial context.…”
Section: Convolutional Neural Network For Protein–protein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%