2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting social (in)stability in primates from their temporal co-presence network

Abstract: The stability of social relationships is important to animals living in groups, and social network analysis provides a powerful tool to help characterize and understand their (in)stability and the consequences at the group level. However, the use of dynamic social networks is still limited in this context because it requires longterm social data and new analytical tools. Here, we study the dynamic evolution of a group of 29 Guinea baboons (Papio papio) using a dataset of automatically collected cognitive tests… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First: are the connections of the network stable in time, or rapidly changing? Second: does the network have a clear and specific structural organization, and if so, is it persistent in time or unstable and only transient?In order to answer the first question, we quantified, for each neuron i, how much its neighborhood changed between successive time windows 37,38,42,43 . To this aim we computed for each i and at each time t the cosine similarity Θ i (t) between the neighborhoods of i (the subgraphs composed only by the edges involving i) at time t − 1 and at time t. To analyze the unweighted temporal networks, we instead used the Jaccard index J i (t) between these successive neighborhoods (see Methods for precise definitions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First: are the connections of the network stable in time, or rapidly changing? Second: does the network have a clear and specific structural organization, and if so, is it persistent in time or unstable and only transient?In order to answer the first question, we quantified, for each neuron i, how much its neighborhood changed between successive time windows 37,38,42,43 . To this aim we computed for each i and at each time t the cosine similarity Θ i (t) between the neighborhoods of i (the subgraphs composed only by the edges involving i) at time t − 1 and at time t. To analyze the unweighted temporal networks, we instead used the Jaccard index J i (t) between these successive neighborhoods (see Methods for precise definitions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to answer the first question, we quantified, for each neuron i, how much its neighborhood changed between successive time windows 37,38,42,43 . To this aim we computed for each i and at each time t the cosine 3/33 19/33 28/33…”
Section: Information Sharing Dynamics Can Be Described As a Temporal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First: are the connections of the network stable in time, or rapidly changing? Second: does the network have a clear and specific structural organization, and if so, is it persistent in time or unstable and only transient?In order to answer the first question, we quantified, for each neuron i, how much its neighborhood changed between successive time windows 37,38,42,43 . To this aim we computed for each i and at each time t the cosine 3/33 19/33 28/33…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between 70 sensors and direct observations or videos have yielded mixed results [46,47]. Among 71 animals, different types of networks built from the same data set of direct observations 72 have been shown to differ [41,42], while a social network deduced from co-presence in 73 cognitive testing booths has been shown to correlate with the one obtained from 74 directly observed interactions [48,49]. However, we are not aware of studies using data 75 collected in the same population with on the one hand wearable sensors and on the 76 other hand direct observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, all individuals 47 equipped with a sensor are monitored together, continuously and potentially for a long 48 time without the need for constant human supervision. This enables in principle the 49 collection of large data sets covering long periods of times and, consequently, makes it 50 possible to investigate the evolution and stability of social relationships and social 51 groups on long timescales. On the other hand, wearable sensors do not yield 52 information on the type of behavioral interactions and they do not register contacts 53 with individuals not wearing any sensor, such as very young individuals or out-group 54 members for instance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%