2003
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses

Abstract: The result of population crosses on traits such as mating rate, oviposition rate and survivorship are increasingly used to distinguish between modes of coevolution between the sexes. Two key hypotheses, erected from a verbal theory of sexually antagonistic coevolution, have been the subject of several recent tests. First, statistical interactions arising in population crosses are suggested to be indicative of a complex signal/receiver system. In the case of oviposition rates, an interaction between populations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results represent a generalization of those in Gavrilets et al (2001;see also Gavrilets & Waxman 2002;Rowe et al 2003 and a review of similar models in Gavrilets & Hayashi 2005) for the case of more general functions j and w f . Other generalizations have also been explored.…”
Section: Sexual Conflicts Over Mating S Gavrilets and T I Hayashi 347supporting
confidence: 74%
“…These results represent a generalization of those in Gavrilets et al (2001;see also Gavrilets & Waxman 2002;Rowe et al 2003 and a review of similar models in Gavrilets & Hayashi 2005) for the case of more general functions j and w f . Other generalizations have also been explored.…”
Section: Sexual Conflicts Over Mating S Gavrilets and T I Hayashi 347supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The results of population crosses are not necessarily diagnostic of the existence of sexual conflict (Rowe et al 2003), so we do not claim that sexual conflict does or does not occur in these populations. Rather, our results indicate that if sexual conflict occurs, it must interact with ecological divergence to drive the evolution of reproductive isolation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The results for parapatric pairs are in the same direction, but less definitive and relatively heterogeneous. The observed heterogeneity among population pairs might be expected for sexual forms of reproductive isolation if different traits and different mutations are involved in different populations (Schluter & Price 1993;Parker & Partridge 1998;Rowe et al 2003). Some specific pairs of parapatric populations exhibited significantly reduced female fecundity in between-population crosses, but most did not (table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This suggests that there is very limited variability in this trait within a single population. Thus, population crosses or gonopodium experimental manipulation would be required to assess the role that genital hooks play in mediating the success of forced matings (but see [59]). Our analysis also revealed corresponding patterns of trait diversification in female genital morphology (relative oviduct width).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%