2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2417634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Relevant Changes in Time Series Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our test shares some similarity with the work of Dette and Wied (2016), who consider CUSUM tests in the spirit of Brown et al (1975) but allow for a constant parameter differences under the null. They do, however, not consider local-to-zero breaks, which would eliminate break date uncertainty in our asymptotic framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Our test shares some similarity with the work of Dette and Wied (2016), who consider CUSUM tests in the spirit of Brown et al (1975) but allow for a constant parameter differences under the null. They do, however, not consider local-to-zero breaks, which would eliminate break date uncertainty in our asymptotic framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Building on Theorem 2, and inspired by an idea by Dette and Wied (2016), it is possible to propose a test for "relevant" randomness. As mentioned in the introduction, it is possible that a small amount of randomness in the autoregressive coefficient (measured as τ 2 ) may actually be negligible for practical purposes, with a standard and simpler AR (1) model working better than the RCA(1) model.…”
Section: Testing Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the self-normalised nature of the WLS estimator, our test is robust to the stationarity or lack thereof of X t , and no prior knowledge of this is required; also, our test is not affected by the well-known inconsistency of the estimator of σ 2 when X t is nonstationary (see Aue and Horváth, 2011). In addition to this, motivated by a recent paper by Dette and Wied (2016), we also study a test for "relevant" randomness as an application of our results on the limiting distribution of the WLS estimator of τ 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High dimensional time series change-point detection problems are the obvious but by no means straightforward extension of the univariate case. To detect changes in the covariance matrix of a multivariate time series, Aue et al (2009) introduced a method using a nonparametric CUSUM type test, Dette & Wied (2016) proposed a test where the dimension of the data is fixed while more recently Kao et al (2018) considered the case where the dimension of the data increases with the sample size (they also investigated change-point analysis based on Principal Component Analysis). Sundararajan & Pourahmadi (2018) proposed a new method for detecting multiple change-points in the covariance structure of a multivariate piecewise-stationary process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%