2022
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting (non)parallel evolution in multidimensional spaces: angles, correlations and eigenanalysis

Abstract: Parallelism between evolutionary trajectories in a trait space is often seen as evidence for repeatability of phenotypic evolution, and angles between trajectories play a pivotal role in the analysis of parallelism. However, properties of angles in multidimensional spaces have not been widely appreciated by biologists. To remedy this situation, this study provides a brief overview on geometric and statistical aspects of angles in multidimensional spaces. Under the null hypothesis that trajectory vectors have n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6B ), but, of the six ruminant subfamilies with at least 10 species (the previously mentioned subfamilies and Caprinae), the relationship is only significant in Cephalophinae ( P = 0.012, F = 9.18). Note that, in hyperdimensional spaces like the one here ( k = 75), a distribution of random angles will be normally distributed around 90° with a lower standard deviation than lower-dimensional spaces ( 38 ). The angles of divergence and CREA were significantly different than a distribution of 10,000 random k -dimensional angles [two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P < 0.001; ( 67 )] (fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6B ), but, of the six ruminant subfamilies with at least 10 species (the previously mentioned subfamilies and Caprinae), the relationship is only significant in Cephalophinae ( P = 0.012, F = 9.18). Note that, in hyperdimensional spaces like the one here ( k = 75), a distribution of random angles will be normally distributed around 90° with a lower standard deviation than lower-dimensional spaces ( 38 ). The angles of divergence and CREA were significantly different than a distribution of 10,000 random k -dimensional angles [two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P < 0.001; ( 67 )] (fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some consequences of such practices have been seen in the above empirical examples. Watanabe (2022a) has documented a similar problem in the context of characterizing parallelism between evolutionary trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This distributional result is fairly well recognized in the literature, and there are many possible ways to prove it, especially when q = 1 (see, e.g., Muirhead, 1982; Rice, 1990; Anderson, 2003; Cai et al ., 2013). Watanabe (2022a) restated one of those proofs in a context where the polarities of the vectors are relevant. The result for the special case of q = 1 is frequently used for testing alignment between allometric vectors in the morphometric literature (e.g., Klingenberg & Marugán-Lobón, 2013), where Li (2011) seems to be a preferred citation.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown across empirical datasets, the genome‐wide distribution of eigenvalues is dependent on dataset features, such as SNP density, sampling/vector design and phylogeny. Consequently, a singular null distribution such as the Wishart distribution (De Lisle & Bolnick, 2020) or the various statistical nulls suggested by Watanabe (2022), is not applicable across all possible genomic datasets. However, the interpretation of empirical p‐values derived from the permuted null should be treated with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%