2012
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2012.00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Multineuronal Temporal Patterns in Parallel Spike Trains

Abstract: We present a non-parametric and computationally efficient method that detects spatiotemporal firing patterns and pattern sequences in parallel spike trains and tests whether the observed numbers of repeating patterns and sequences on a given timescale are significantly different from those expected by chance. The method is generally applicable and uncovers coordinated activity with arbitrary precision by comparing it to appropriate surrogate data. The analysis of coherent patterns of spatially and temporally d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lopes-dos- Santos et al, 2011;Peyrache et al, 2010), independent component analysis (Laubach et al, 1999), shuffling methods for detecting repeated firing sequences (Abeles and Gat, 2001;Abeles and Gerstein, 1988;Berger et al, 2010;Gansel and Singer, 2012), and methods based on information theory (Arabzadeh et al, 2004;Quiroga and Panzeri, 2009), among others. In this review we focus on linear methods for detecting and tracking the activity of cell assemblies embedded in large neuronal populations.…”
Section: Lopes-dos-santos Et Al / Journal Of Neuroscience Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lopes-dos- Santos et al, 2011;Peyrache et al, 2010), independent component analysis (Laubach et al, 1999), shuffling methods for detecting repeated firing sequences (Abeles and Gat, 2001;Abeles and Gerstein, 1988;Berger et al, 2010;Gansel and Singer, 2012), and methods based on information theory (Arabzadeh et al, 2004;Quiroga and Panzeri, 2009), among others. In this review we focus on linear methods for detecting and tracking the activity of cell assemblies embedded in large neuronal populations.…”
Section: Lopes-dos-santos Et Al / Journal Of Neuroscience Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27,26,21]) or assume a more or less noiseless scenario, seeking to classify exactly recurring STP in neuronal activity (apart from allowing some jitter, see e.g. [9]). Fitting Hopfield networks on windowed spike train data, we obtain networks that encode denoised versions of salient temporal spike patterns present in the data as memories.…”
Section: Understanding the Activity Of Large Collections Of Neurons Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past decades have seen the arrival of many methods that can characterize spike timing networks (Abeles and Gerstein, 1988; Chapin and Nicolelis, 1999; Nádasdy et al, 1999; Tetko and Villa, 2001; Grün et al, 2002; Lee and Wilson, 2002; Schnitzer and Meister, 2003; Ikegaya et al, 2004; Okatan et al, 2005; Schneider et al, 2006; Nikolíc, 2007; Pipa et al, 2008; Schrader et al, 2008; Berger et al, 2010; Eldawlatly et al, 2010; Louis et al, 2010; Peyrache et al, 2010; Humphries, 2011; Lopes-dos-Santos et al, 2011; Gansel and Singer, 2012; Torre et al, 2016). Their application has led to important insights, yet they have several limitations, especially when it comes to their application on large scale neuronal recordings (Buzsáki, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%