Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) 2014
DOI: 10.3115/v1/d14-1191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Latent Ideology in Expert Text: Evidence From Academic Papers in Economics

Abstract: Previous work on extracting ideology from text has focused on domains where expression of political views is expected, but it's unclear if current technology can work in domains where displays of ideology are considered inappropriate. We present a supervised ensemble n-gram model for ideology extraction with topic adjustments and apply it to one such domain: research papers written by academic economists. We show economists' political leanings can be correctly predicted, that our predictions generalize to new … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If true, this implies that economists choose ideologically similar coauthors as research partners, which may limit the range of hypotheses, interpretations, and implications they consider. In this sense, our results support the finding of Jelveh et al (2014) that latent ideology is present in published research. Again, our goal is not to denounce economics as an inherently ideologically driven enterprise but rather encourage healthy skepticism in the consumption of economic expertise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If true, this implies that economists choose ideologically similar coauthors as research partners, which may limit the range of hypotheses, interpretations, and implications they consider. In this sense, our results support the finding of Jelveh et al (2014) that latent ideology is present in published research. Again, our goal is not to denounce economics as an inherently ideologically driven enterprise but rather encourage healthy skepticism in the consumption of economic expertise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, some analyses report significant correlations between ideology measures and responses on some politically salient items (Wolfers 2013;Sapienza and Zingales 2013). Similarly, Jelveh et al (2014) use automated text analysis to detect latent ideology in published economics research and validate their algorithm using these items. However, the claim of Gordon and Dahl (2013) is that the IGM data show aggregate consensus in the belief system of professional economists rather than the (undisputed) point that there is consensus on certain beliefs.…”
Section: Consensus and Conflict In The Economics Professionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iyyer et al (2014) applied a deep learning framework to infer the political position of sentences, and Sim et al (2013) learned an ideological space from a corpus of explicitly ideological books and then used a probabilistic model to predict ideological valence from politician speeches. Jelveh et al (2014) correctly predicted the ideological leanings of professional economists through a supervised ensemble n-gram model applied to their research papers.…”
Section: Social States Through Heterogeneous Signals Within Communicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language and ideology. Recently, natural language processing techniques were applied to identify ideologies in a variety of large scale text collections, including congressional debates [14,24], presidential debates [19], academic papers [15], books [29], and Twitter posts [4,33,34]. All this work operates on a predefined dimension of conservative-liberal political ideology using known slant labels; in the news media domain slant is seldom declared or proven with certainty and thus we need to resort to an unsupervised methodology.…”
Section: Further Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%