2010
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2010.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting interactions with membrane proteins using a membrane two-hybrid assay in yeast

Abstract: The biological function of proteins may be predicted by identification of their interacting partners, and one of the major goals of the postgenomic era is the mapping of protein interaction networks. Membrane proteins are of particular interest because of their role in disease and because of their prevalence as major pharmaceutical targets. Unfortunately, because of their hydrophobic nature, they have long been difficult to study in a high-throughput format. A powerful technology recently developed to facilita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
160
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
160
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the actual membrane topology of human Tmem65, we employed a membrane yeast two-hybrid (MYTH) system, as previously described (Fig. 4c,d) [26][27][28] . To determine protein topography, both N-terminal (TF-Cub-Tmem65) and C-terminal (Tmem65-Cub-TF) 'bait' Tmem65 proteins were tested for protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in the presence of a non-interacting yeast integral membrane protein Ost1p (ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the actual membrane topology of human Tmem65, we employed a membrane yeast two-hybrid (MYTH) system, as previously described (Fig. 4c,d) [26][27][28] . To determine protein topography, both N-terminal (TF-Cub-Tmem65) and C-terminal (Tmem65-Cub-TF) 'bait' Tmem65 proteins were tested for protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in the presence of a non-interacting yeast integral membrane protein Ost1p (ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be tempting to attribute this limited coverage to the intrinsic properties of many AD-related proteins which, due to their transmembrane or secreted nature, are experimentally difficult to handle. To check whether this was the case, we compared the number of interactions detected for each of the nine seed proteins employed (three secreted, three transmembrane, and three intracellular), and found no significant difference (10.3, 11.7, and 10.3 interactions per protein on average, respectively), although the use of different Y2H setups specially designed to deal with transmembrane proteins might indeed increase the coverage (Snider et al 2010). Thus, in this particular study, failure to detect interactions is likely to be the result of the high stringency applied to our Y2H assays, particularly designed to minimize false-positives, although this criterion might penalize detection of some weak or transient interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine whether motif A or motif B is essential for the physical interaction of Msn2 with Gal11, we have utilized the Split Ubiquitin yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay. The split ubiquitin is a Y2H assay that is based on conditional proteolysis of ubiquitinated Ura3-conjugated proteins (Snider et al, 2010). This assay was extensively used to monitor interactions between membrane proteins and between transcriptional-activating domains, such as Gal4 and Gcn4, with other cellular proteins (Lim et al, 2007;Snider et al, 2010).…”
Section: Msn2 Motif a And Motif B Are Essential For Msn2 And Gal11 Inmentioning
confidence: 99%