2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2011.5946659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting human activities in retail surveillance using hierarchical finite state machine

Abstract: Cashiers in retail stores usually exhibit certain repetitive and periodic activities when processing items. Detecting such activities plays a key role in most retail fraud detection systems. In this paper, we propose a highly efficient, effective and robust vision technique to detect checkout-related primitive activities, based on a hierarchical finite state machine (FSM). Our deterministic approach uses visual features and prior spatial constraints on the hand motion to capture particular motion patterns perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance of the multimodal ranking approach in terms of recall and alarms rate. For the same recall (detection rate), our approach achieves better alarms rate compared to the heuristics-based approach, as well as compared to the best performance of [15] and [5]. system described in [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Performance of the multimodal ranking approach in terms of recall and alarms rate. For the same recall (detection rate), our approach achieves better alarms rate compared to the heuristics-based approach, as well as compared to the best performance of [15] and [5]. system described in [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For the same recall (detection rate), our approach achieves better alarms rate compared to the heuristics-based approach, as well as compared to the best performance of [15] and [5]. system described in [15]. We rank the list of nonscans detected by [15] based on their confidence scores, and returns nonscans with scores above a certain threshold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations