Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies 2017
DOI: 10.5220/0006213600190031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Hacked Twitter Accounts based on Behavioural Change

Abstract: Abstract:Social media accounts are valuable for hackers for spreading phishing links, malware and spam. Furthermore, some people deliberately hack an acquaintance to damage his or her image. This paper describes a classification for detecting hacked Twitter accounts. The model is mainly based on features associated with behavioural change such as changes in language, source, URLs, retweets, frequency and time. We experiment with a Twitter data set containing tweets of more than 100 Dutch users including 37 who… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, 60% of the case studies were uncovered in the last days [12]. is kind of attack has been discussed in [8,9,[13][14][15][16][17]].…”
Section: Compromised Accounts By a Botmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, 60% of the case studies were uncovered in the last days [12]. is kind of attack has been discussed in [8,9,[13][14][15][16][17]].…”
Section: Compromised Accounts By a Botmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method compared real behaviour with the behaviour of the model as well as identified and distinguished the behaviour with a relatively large difference. In another study [25], Nauta described a J48-based classification model for detecting hacked Twitter accounts by examining the changing characteristics of their behaviour. The model detected the changes in the language, source, URL, retweet, frequency, and time of the tweet of the user, thereby achieving the purpose of detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%