2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.115146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Goldstone modes with entanglement entropy

Abstract: In the face of mounting numerical evidence, Metlitski and Grover [arXiv:1112.5166] have given compelling analytical arguments that systems with spontaneous broken continuous symmetry contain a sub-leading contribution to the entanglement entropy that diverges logarithmically with system size. They predict that the coefficient of this log is a universal quantity that depends on the number of Goldstone modes. In this paper, we confirm the presence of this log term through quantum Monte Carlo calculations of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in toroidal geometries of circumference 2L. The number of Nambu-Goldstone modes obtained from the prefactor of this term is in perfect agreement with field theoretical expectations [10,19,53,54], with accuracy at the percent level or lower. The fact that the VNE returns a value which is considerably closer to the field theoretical prediction when compared to the one extracted from Renyi entropies [17,19] may signal the fact that the latter are more affected by irrelevant operators, as observed in 1D [47,48,50], or may be due to the smoother continuity properties of the VNE.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Quantum Magnetssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…in toroidal geometries of circumference 2L. The number of Nambu-Goldstone modes obtained from the prefactor of this term is in perfect agreement with field theoretical expectations [10,19,53,54], with accuracy at the percent level or lower. The fact that the VNE returns a value which is considerably closer to the field theoretical prediction when compared to the one extracted from Renyi entropies [17,19] may signal the fact that the latter are more affected by irrelevant operators, as observed in 1D [47,48,50], or may be due to the smoother continuity properties of the VNE.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Quantum Magnetssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We first recall in Section IV C 1 the origin of this logarithmic contribution in the presence of a broken symmetry, as stemming from the interplay between the tower-of-state entanglement spectrum of a subsystem and the low-lying Goldstone modes coupling two subsystems. In so doing we shall rephrase arguments which have been put forward in earlier works [57,59], but we will also generalize them to the case of long-range interactions, which add the new ingredient of a continuously varying dynamical exponent z ≤ 1. Furthermore we shall specialize in Section IV C 2 our discussion to the case of d = 1, where the analysis is somewhat more subtle.…”
Section: B Entanglement and Fluctuations In The Mediumand Short-rangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in Ref. [57,59], the Hamiltionan of the coupled A and B rotors can then be approximated as that of a harmonic oscillator of frequency ∆ G / [57,59]. Tracing out subsystem B leads to a densitymatrix description of subsystem A, in which ToS modes are populated up to an energy of the order of ∆ G , namely up to an angular momentum L max ∼ (I∆ G ) 1/2 ; hence, knowing that ToS levels L have a degeneracy of order L N −2 , the EE can be estimated by simple state counting as S A ∼ log Ω A , where…”
Section: Xy Phase: Logarithmic Term From the Tower-of-state Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include Goldstone modes due to spontaneous breaking of a continuous symmetry [1][2][3][4]; topological order [5][6][7]; Fermi surfaces [8,9]; quantum criticality [10][11][12][13]; and more. If a system is divided into two spatial regions A and B, the entanglement in a pure state can be characterized by the von Neumann entropy associated with the reduced density matrix of either subsystem,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%