2019
DOI: 10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2019.5.mwsf-532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matrices

Abstract: The advent of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) has brought about completely novel ways of transforming and manipulating pixels in digital images. GAN based techniques such as Image-to-Image translations, DeepFakes, and other automated methods have become increasingly popular in creating fake images. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to detect GAN generated fake images using a combination of co-occurrence matrices and deep learning. We extract co-occurrence matrices on three color channels in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
169
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
169
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We use horse images from CycleGAN and AutoGAN for training respectively. Since both the JPEG compression and image resize destroy the up-sampling artifact, the model trained with images without post-processing does not generalize to the post-processed images, also as reported in [15]. Training a new model with post-processed images improves the performance on post-processed images.…”
Section: F Robustness To Post-processingmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use horse images from CycleGAN and AutoGAN for training respectively. Since both the JPEG compression and image resize destroy the up-sampling artifact, the model trained with images without post-processing does not generalize to the post-processed images, also as reported in [15]. Training a new model with post-processed images improves the performance on post-processed images.…”
Section: F Robustness To Post-processingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Marra et al [4] propose to use raw pixel and conventional forensics features extracted from real and fake images to train a classifier. Nataraj et al [15] propose to use the co-occurrence matrix as features and show better performance than that of classifiers trained over raw pixels on CycleGAN data. McCloskey and Albright [16] observe that GAN generated images have some artifacts in color cues due to the normalization layers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have proposed three preprocessing methods and a novel evaluation technique in order to convert the flowbase data into continuous values which are fed into GAN and to evaluate the quality of the generated traffic data. In [419], a novel approach for the detection of fake images generated by GAN is proposed. The proposed approach computes the co-occurrence matrices on the RGB channels of the images and uses those matrices to train the CNN model to detect fake GAN images.…”
Section: Other Adversarial Based Attack and Defence Techniques In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adversarial training paradigm features two main components: the generator (i.e., the image-to-image network) and the discriminator (i.e., the support network). Within the paradigm, the generator's training revolves around learning to deceive the discriminator, while the discriminator is trained to detect real images from forged ones [55][56][57]. In a previous study [23], Zhu et al devised a method for automatically pairing images, thus, overcoming the shortage in genuine image pairs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%