2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting forest disturbance in the Pacific Northwest from MODIS time series using temporal segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculated the proportion of disturbed Landsat pixels, weighted by magnitude, within each 800-m pixel from 2000 to 2012. All pixels with weighted disturbance N30% were masked, following Sulla-Menashe et al (2014). There is no FVI value associated with masked pixels.…”
Section: Filtering Abrupt Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the proportion of disturbed Landsat pixels, weighted by magnitude, within each 800-m pixel from 2000 to 2012. All pixels with weighted disturbance N30% were masked, following Sulla-Menashe et al (2014). There is no FVI value associated with masked pixels.…”
Section: Filtering Abrupt Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, equally important has been the coinciding progression in methodologies used to monitor forest and change dynamics. Earlier approaches that largely focused on bi-temporal change analysis [9,10] are being superseded by advanced methods taking a more dense time-series approach [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods focussed on seeking deviations have often used annual or biennial time-steps [11,[16][17][18] and are generally suited for the detection of abrupt change events such as clear-cutting, fire damage, flooding, and wind throw. Methods that use trends describe complete time series trajectories [19,20], and when multiple trend segments are used, are capable of capturing both abrupt and gradual change [12,15] including forest degradation, disease and insect attack, climatic adaptation, and regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, we collected 106 training samples, among which, 53 were sites with MPB mortality, 37 were clearcuts and 16 were healthy. We selected the relatively small number of training samples, because many studies suggested that trajectory-based methods perform well when trained with a relatively small sample size [23,26,41]. Statistical classifiers require more training data to fully represent each class in the feature space [42].…”
Section: Reference Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details can be found in Kennedy et al [26], and the final effect of temporal segmentation, whether it was under-segmentation (split up into too few parts) or over-segmentation (subdivided into too many parts), was determined by the parameters listed in Table 3. Optimal LandTrendr parameter settings have been tested in the forests of the Northwest Pacific Region at both Landsat and MODIS scales [26,41]. However, because we are not aware of reported parameter results in the literature specific to the Southern Rocky Mountain ecoregion, we tested a range of candidate parameter values (Table 3).…”
Section: Temporal Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%