1998
DOI: 10.2307/2669625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Features in Spatial Point Processes with Clutter via Model-Based Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
165
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
165
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The grid-based method (Wang et al, 1997) quantizes the object space into a finite number of cells that form a gird structure. The model-based method (Dasgupta, 1998) hypothesizes a model for each cluster and finds the best fit of the data to the given model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid-based method (Wang et al, 1997) quantizes the object space into a finite number of cells that form a gird structure. The model-based method (Dasgupta, 1998) hypothesizes a model for each cluster and finds the best fit of the data to the given model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provision of an exhaustive list of important work over the past three decades is not feasible here. However, the following works, amongst many others, would form part of such a list: McLachlan (1982), McLachlan and Basford (1988), Banfield and Raftery (1993), Celeux and Govaert (1995), Dasgupta and Raftery (1998), McLachlan and Peel (2000b), Fraley and Raftery (2002), Raftery and Dean (2006), McLachlan et al (2007), McNicholas and Murphy (2008), and Gormley and Murphy (2008).…”
Section: Model-based Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the number of clusters is set, geometrical constraints are imposed and the dimensionality of the representation is again determined by the lower value of the BIC* criterion when the values of M are increased, conditional to the previously set number of mixture components. As in Dasgupta and Raftery (1998), a rule to determine a significantly lower BIC* value is proposed; differences exceeding 0.005 min (BIC*) between two BIC* values are viewed as strong evidence that the model corresponding to the lower BIC* value is the better adjusted model.…”
Section: A Model Selection Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%