2012
DOI: 10.1515/1544-6115.1826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Differential Expression in RNA-sequence Data Using Quasi-likelihood with Shrunken Dispersion Estimates

Abstract: Next generation sequencing technology provides a powerful tool for measuring gene expression (mRNA) levels in the form of RNA-sequence data. Method development for identifying differentially expressed (DE) genes from RNA-seq data, which frequently includes many low-count integers and can exhibit severe overdispersion relative to Poisson or binomial 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
293
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
293
0
Order By: Relevance
“…growth condition main effects), and interactions between genotypes and growth conditions using the R package QuasiSeq (http://cran.r-project.org/ web/packages/QuasiSeq). The negative binomial QLShrink method implemented in the QuasiSeq package as described previously (Lund et al, 2012) was used to compute a P value for each gene and each test described above. The log of each count mean was modeled as the sum of an intercept term, a genotype effect, a growth condition effect, an interaction between genotype and growth condition, and an offset normalization factor, determined for each sample by the log of the TMM normalization factor (Robinson and Oshlack, 2010).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…growth condition main effects), and interactions between genotypes and growth conditions using the R package QuasiSeq (http://cran.r-project.org/ web/packages/QuasiSeq). The negative binomial QLShrink method implemented in the QuasiSeq package as described previously (Lund et al, 2012) was used to compute a P value for each gene and each test described above. The log of each count mean was modeled as the sum of an intercept term, a genotype effect, a growth condition effect, an interaction between genotype and growth condition, and an offset normalization factor, determined for each sample by the log of the TMM normalization factor (Robinson and Oshlack, 2010).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [11], we assume that the prior distribution for σ 2 g is a scaled inverse χ 2 -distribution with degrees of freedom d 0 and scaling factor s 2 0 d 0 , i.e.,…”
Section: Estimating Prior Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, loess-style weighting is used to improved the weighted likelihood approach, and an analogy with quasi-likelihood [11] is used to estimate the optimal weight to be given to the empirical Bayes prior. The article includes a fully worked case study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other approach (see discussion after Section 2) is to choose a method of single imputation of missing values and then to use available approaches to identify differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Some available packages in R such as DEGseq (Wang et al, 2010), easyRNAseq (Delhomme et al, 2012) and QuasiSeq (Lund et al, 2012) can be used for this purpose. One approach is to use a regression method for identifying differentially expressed genes as follows:…”
Section: Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes From Rna-seq Datamentioning
confidence: 99%