2021 Ninth International Symposium on Computing and Networking Workshops (CANDARW) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/candarw53999.2021.00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting DDoS Attacks on SDN Data Plane with Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When an attack is detected, flows are blocked based on the list they belong to. This work extends and combines our previous published papers, which appeared in References 17 and 18, by using a more evolving solution using reputation algorithms, node priority, and ML detecting mechanism applied to the SDN data plane. As far as we are aware, this is the first work to apply ML techniques for attack detection and mechanisms for attack mitigation directly in the data plane.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…When an attack is detected, flows are blocked based on the list they belong to. This work extends and combines our previous published papers, which appeared in References 17 and 18, by using a more evolving solution using reputation algorithms, node priority, and ML detecting mechanism applied to the SDN data plane. As far as we are aware, this is the first work to apply ML techniques for attack detection and mechanisms for attack mitigation directly in the data plane.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In the performance analysis, we find that the choice of kernel functions greatly affects the accuracy results. For all the experimental cases, the "RBF" kernel remains the most favorable 93 but takes a lot of time to train the classifier. Either we can use PCA for dimensionality reduction or use the linear kernel.…”
Section: Results With Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithm 1 Example of a P4 Match/Action table defined for the n-th decision tree level [55]. [49] 2021 Paolucci et al [52] 2021 Zhang et al [56] 2021 Barradas et al [50] 2021 Zheng et al [57] 2022 Hardegen et al [58] 2022 Ganesan et al [59] 2022 Heggi et al [60] 2022 Zang et al [61] 2022 Carvalho et al [62] 2022 Coelho et al [63] 2022 Roshani et al [64] 2022 Gaikar et al [65] 2023 Al Sadi et al [66] 2023 Zang et al [67] 2023 González et al [68] 2023 Doriguzzi et al [69] 2023 Wang et al [70] 2023 Khedr et al [71] 2023…”
Section: ) Machine Learning (Ml)mentioning
confidence: 99%