2006
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/27/5/s15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting cryoablation with EIT and the benefit of including ice front imaging data

Abstract: Imaging has made cryosurgery, the destruction of unwanted tissue through freezing, valuable. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has been explored as a method to determine the volume of tissue that is frozen during the procedure. However, studies have shown that tissue near the edge of the frozen zone often survives since in this region it may only be the extra-cellular space that is frozen. This threatens the usefulness of cryosurgery for cancer therapy since inaccurate ablation either allows the cancer to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would also prevent the elevated specific impedance magnitude near the ice front from causing the ice front position to be overestimated (Edd et al 2005) while retaining the sharp transition in properties at the ice front. For imaging viability post-thaw, resolution can be enhanced by incorporating the prior knowledge of the ice front position (Edd and Rubinsky 2006) since unfrozen tissue seems little affected by nearby freezing (see figure 6(d)), however care must be taken that changes in conductivity outside of the frozen region are not prevented but that they are assumed to be less likely to occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would also prevent the elevated specific impedance magnitude near the ice front from causing the ice front position to be overestimated (Edd et al 2005) while retaining the sharp transition in properties at the ice front. For imaging viability post-thaw, resolution can be enhanced by incorporating the prior knowledge of the ice front position (Edd and Rubinsky 2006) since unfrozen tissue seems little affected by nearby freezing (see figure 6(d)), however care must be taken that changes in conductivity outside of the frozen region are not prevented but that they are assumed to be less likely to occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional MRI also presents a possible solution (Preece et al 2001); however, it also incurs a high cost and long acquisition time. EIT has recently been proposed as a method for detecting tissue viability after cryosurgery (Davalos and Rubinsky 2004; Edd and Rubinsky 2006). This is based on the principle that cell membrane integrity, and hence viability, influences greatly the electrical conductivity at frequencies below the β dielectric dispersion (Grimnes and Martinsen 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ratio is typical (Smith et al 1986, Miklavcic et al 2006. When the effect of noise was examined we used a noise parameter A of 0.1%, as in Edd and Rubinsky (2006). The results shown here were chosen from a large number of tests for their ability to illustrate the concept and demonstrate its feasibility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where v is a vector of normally distributed random numbers, with mean zero and standard deviation one (the same dimensions as the V 0 vector), and A is the noise level (Edd and Rubinsky 2006). In our simulations A = 0.1%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where v is a vector of normally distributed random numbers, with a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one (the same dimensions as the V 0 vector), and A is the noise level (Edd and Rubinsky 2006). Three noise levels were examined in this study: 0.1%, 1% and 2%.…”
Section: Noise Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%