2024
DOI: 10.22541/essoar.170594183.33534487/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting, attributing, and projecting global marine ecosystem and fisheries change: FishMIP 2.0

Julia L. Blanchard,
Camilla Novaglio,
Olivier Maury
et al.

Abstract: There is an urgent need for models that can robustly detect past and project future ecosystem changes and risks to the services that they provide to people. The Fisheries and Marine Ecosystem Model Intercomparison Project (FishMIP) was established to develop model ensembles for projecting long-term impacts of climate change on fisheries and marine ecosystems while informing policy at spatio-temporal scales relevant to the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP) framework. While contributin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on previous efforts to enhance regional MEM for the Southern Ocean (Constable et al, 2023;McCormack et al, 2021;Murphy et al, 2012), and facilitated by the FishMIP 2.0 protocol (Blanchard et al, 2024;Ortega-Cisneros et al, this issue) and the extensive FishMIP network, we first assembled and consulted a group of experts in ocean, biogeochemical, biological and socio-ecological modelling. We determined that a skill assessment of the ocean-biogeochemical model environmental forcing variables (sea surface temperature (SST), sea ice concentration, and phytoplankton biomass: Table S1; collectively referred to as climate forcings from hereon in) used in FishMIP 3a and required to drive MEMs was necessary to establish if they are fit-forpurpose in Southern Ocean regions.…”
Section: Protocol Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Building on previous efforts to enhance regional MEM for the Southern Ocean (Constable et al, 2023;McCormack et al, 2021;Murphy et al, 2012), and facilitated by the FishMIP 2.0 protocol (Blanchard et al, 2024;Ortega-Cisneros et al, this issue) and the extensive FishMIP network, we first assembled and consulted a group of experts in ocean, biogeochemical, biological and socio-ecological modelling. We determined that a skill assessment of the ocean-biogeochemical model environmental forcing variables (sea surface temperature (SST), sea ice concentration, and phytoplankton biomass: Table S1; collectively referred to as climate forcings from hereon in) used in FishMIP 3a and required to drive MEMs was necessary to establish if they are fit-forpurpose in Southern Ocean regions.…”
Section: Protocol Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant at the regional scale, where FishMIP outputs could play a critical role in informing climate-resilient fisheries policy and management. To build confidence in projections, a new phase of the model intercomparison project, FishMIP 2.0, considers aspects such as the use of higher spatial resolution, reanalysis-forced ocean model outputs, and globallystandardised fishing effort forcing the development of a model ensemble skill assessment and evaluation framework for FishMIP 3a (Blanchard et al, 2024;Frieler et al, 2024), as well as integration of future climate and fishing scenarios (Maury et al,this issue,FishMIP 3b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation