2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting archaic introgression and modeling multiple-wave admixture with ArchaicSeeker 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the adaptive EPAS1 haplotype was proven as a “borrowed fitness” from Denisovans [ 34 ]. To search for the genome-wide regions showing signatures of archaic introgression in the Tibetan genomes, we employed two widely used tools, ArchaicSeeker2.0 [ 35 ] and SPrime [ 36 ] (see the “ Methods ” section), which gave 599 and 670 candidate introgression regions, respectively. The detected genome-wide introgression levels (0.06–0.18% from Denisovan and 0.34–0.79% from Neanderthal) of Tibetans are similar to those reported in other East Asian populations [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the adaptive EPAS1 haplotype was proven as a “borrowed fitness” from Denisovans [ 34 ]. To search for the genome-wide regions showing signatures of archaic introgression in the Tibetan genomes, we employed two widely used tools, ArchaicSeeker2.0 [ 35 ] and SPrime [ 36 ] (see the “ Methods ” section), which gave 599 and 670 candidate introgression regions, respectively. The detected genome-wide introgression levels (0.06–0.18% from Denisovan and 0.34–0.79% from Neanderthal) of Tibetans are similar to those reported in other East Asian populations [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The default was used for all parameters as suggested in protocol paper. 79 ArchaicSeeker 2.0 used a hidden Markov Model to detect archaic segments on each haplotype. We merged these segments and keep segments detected in all the East Asian subpopulations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using approximate history (Supplementary Figure S10–S13), our results suggest that sstar performed similarly when compared with those using the full history (Figure 1B–1E). For two-source introgression, we compared sstar with SPrime, and ArchaicSeeker2.0 (Yuan et al 2021; Zhang et al 2022), another HMM-based tool. In the Human-Neanderthal-Denisovan model with large datasets, SPrime performed well, though both sstar and SPrime performed better when identifying Denisovan fragments than identifying Neanderthal fragments (Figure 1F and 1G).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%