2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-019-01474-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting anomalous crowd behavior using correlation analysis of optical flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The threshold value is considered to make decisions for anomalous event detection. Further, the proposed methodology has been implemented on all 11 videos of the UMN dataset [30,31].…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The threshold value is considered to make decisions for anomalous event detection. Further, the proposed methodology has been implemented on all 11 videos of the UMN dataset [30,31].…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection has been done by using SVM classification [28,29]. Again, by considering correlation between two consecutive frames optical flow magnitude [30], div-curl [31], entropy [32] characteristics give good accuracy to detect anomalies in crowded regions. Further to detect and locate anomalies presented in video [33] proposed a novel work by considering a concept of momentum from physics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computer vision algorithms that utilise image processing, machine learning and pattern recognition depict the challenges in crowd behavior analysis [5][6][7]. Some of its most crucial applications are crowd control, video surveillance, and the design of intelligent public spaces [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The intelligent environment, which is essential for public safety, can help to redirect the crowd and help the planner to design the public area with the most available space [4].…”
Section: Crowd Anomaly Detection (Cad)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the study of groups of people, advances in analysing behaviour are limited to very concrete and simple activities or actions, usually of short duration (low semantic component) such as a actions in sport games [13], [37], [42], [53], detection interactions of people inside a group [15], [57], [60], inter-group violence [51], [64], [65], among others. If we increase the number of people in the group, becoming crowds, the level of semantics is even lower, being specifically limited to tasks such as counting people and calculating crowd density [8], [18], [25], [68] or detecting movements of a mass of people or crowd collisions [21], [39], [49], [71], mainly for the purpose of security tasks. It is important to highlight the work in [54], in which the authors present a model of learning based on contextual relationships that uses a deep neural network to recognize activities in a video sequence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%