Proceedings of the 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3238147.3238203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting and summarizing GUI changes in evolving mobile apps

Abstract: Mobile applications have become a popular software development domain in recent years due in part to a large user base, capable hardware, and accessible platforms. However, mobile developers also face unique challenges, including pressure for frequent releases to keep pace with rapid platform evolution, hardware iteration, and user feedback. Due to this rapid pace of evolution, developers need automated support for documenting the changes made to their apps in order to aid in program comprehension. One of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some tools touch text inconsistencies and defects [35], [36], [43], similar to some text style don'tguidelines our tool supports. Moran et al [10], [44] develops techniques for detecting presentation inconsistencies between UI mockups and implemented Uls, and the UI changes during evolution. Their methods contrast two similar UIs and find their differences.…”
Section: ) User Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some tools touch text inconsistencies and defects [35], [36], [43], similar to some text style don'tguidelines our tool supports. Moran et al [10], [44] develops techniques for detecting presentation inconsistencies between UI mockups and implemented Uls, and the UI changes during evolution. Their methods contrast two similar UIs and find their differences.…”
Section: ) User Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will rst rapidly mention recent work on GUI generation using Articial Intelligence (from screenshot examples). This is the case of Beltramelli (2017); Chen et al (2018); Moran et al (2018). These approaches rely on a huge dataset of screenshot examples (14,382 screenshots for (Moran et al, 2018) and 10,804 for (Chen et al, 2018)), to train the model.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet other techniques, such as ReDeCheck [38‐42], WebSee [11‐13,43‐45], VFDetector [46], CANVASURE [47], Ply [48], Fighting Layout Bugs [49], Sikuli [50], and techniques based on computer vision [51] and CSS/Javascript analysis [52], detect certain types of presentation failures in web pages. There also exists a group of parallel techniques [53‐55] focusing on the detection and reporting of GUI violations in mobile apps. However, none of them are designed to repair IPFs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%