2012
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2011.599346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting and distinguishing moisture- and salinity-induced stress in wheat and maize throughin situspectroradiometry measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this region, water stressed corn had higher reflectance than unstressed corn in the visible spectrum in contrast to much higher reflectance from unstressed plants when compared to lower reflectance from stressed plants in the NIR spectrum (Elmetwalli et al, 2012). Elmetwalli et al (2012) also observed that water stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) canopy had higher reflectance in the visible region and lower reflectance in the NIR regions when compared to unstressed wheat canopy. Weber et al (2012) observed similar response of water stressed corn to those of Elmetwalli et al (2012) and our study.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this region, water stressed corn had higher reflectance than unstressed corn in the visible spectrum in contrast to much higher reflectance from unstressed plants when compared to lower reflectance from stressed plants in the NIR spectrum (Elmetwalli et al, 2012). Elmetwalli et al (2012) also observed that water stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) canopy had higher reflectance in the visible region and lower reflectance in the NIR regions when compared to unstressed wheat canopy. Weber et al (2012) observed similar response of water stressed corn to those of Elmetwalli et al (2012) and our study.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 51%
“…Elmetwalli et al (2012) also observed that water stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) canopy had higher reflectance in the visible region and lower reflectance in the NIR regions when compared to unstressed wheat canopy. Weber et al (2012) observed similar response of water stressed corn to those of Elmetwalli et al (2012) and our study. Our results were slightly different from those of Elmetwalli et al (2012) that water stressed plant could not quickly enough respond to watering to recover.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reduction in green leaf area due to growth limiting factors (pathogens, insect feeding, nutrient deficiencies), leaf senescence, and defoliation causes high reflectance in the visible spectrum due to chlorophyll degradation, low reflectance in NIR due to reduced green leaf area and senescence, and high reflectance in SWIR due to modified tissue chemistry [38,40,41]. There are numerous successful applications of stress and disease detection and quantification in wheat and other vegetation canopies using a variety of sensor systems including aerial photographs, airborne and satellite multispectral and hyperspectral sensors, ground-based instruments and other spatial information technologies [42][43][44][45][46][47]. Significant correlations between spectral reflectance data and symptoms of net blotch (Pyrenophora teres) in barley, glume blotch (Stagonospora nodorum) in winter wheat, and both diseases in spring wheat were reported by [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%