2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2210.01718
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting and Denoising Gravitational Wave Signals from Binary Black Holes using Deep Learning

Abstract: We present a convolutional neural network, designed in the auto-encoder configuration that can detect and denoise astrophysical gravitational waves from merging black hole binaries, orders of magnitude faster than the conventional matched-filtering based detection that is currently employed at advanced LIGO (aLIGO). The Neural-Net architecture is such that it learns from the sparse representation of data in the time-frequency domain and constructs a non-linear mapping function that maps this representation int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of the GW170823 (Fig. 5c), a BBH event with high chirp mass 29.2M ⊙ , both Bacon et al [25] and Murali et al [26] could recover the phase of original GW signal with certain cycles but failed to recover the complete evaluation in amplitude scale. In the contrast, we observe a clear match in the amplitude of peaks of the extracted GW170823 waveform, with an overlap of 96.95% and 99.00% for Handfold and Livingston, respectively.…”
Section: Recovery Of Binary Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In case of the GW170823 (Fig. 5c), a BBH event with high chirp mass 29.2M ⊙ , both Bacon et al [25] and Murali et al [26] could recover the phase of original GW signal with certain cycles but failed to recover the complete evaluation in amplitude scale. In the contrast, we observe a clear match in the amplitude of peaks of the extracted GW170823 waveform, with an overlap of 96.95% and 99.00% for Handfold and Livingston, respectively.…”
Section: Recovery Of Binary Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Overlap and matched-filtering signal-to-noise (MFSNR) [37] are calculated to represent phase and amplitude recovery performance. We calculate the overlap over the same signal duration [24] for phase recovery and obtain the similar overlaps with [25,26]. With respect to the overlap distribution among the validation dataset for Handford O3b (more samiliar results in other observating runs are provided in Supplementary Materials), overlap is higher than 0.9 for most waveforms (Fig.…”
Section: Recovery Of Binary Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• We further investigated WaveFormer's capacity to recover signals from observational data in terms of phase and amplitude recovery. We achieved state-of-the-art accuracy compared with other deep learning methods [29][30][31][32]. On majority of the detected binary black hole (BBH) events, the phase overlaps are higher than 0.99 (1% error).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%